We ended our satellite TV subscription just over a month ago. Amazingly no one has complained. Not even a hint or a whine. And if anyone would whine, it would probably be me. I'm the one that talked Glen into getting satellite many years ago, but now with just about everything we want available on the internet, there didn't seem to be a good enough reason to pay $52/month to watch our shows.
The TV was the background noise to my life. I occasionally put in DVDs now, but it's not the same. I cleaned and worked on projects while watching (or just listening). I rarely just watched a show. I can do that. Glen can't. Even if it's just a commercial Glen has seen many times before, if the TV is on in a room he's in, he is put into a trance by it and can't seem to focus on anything else. I used to turn off the TV long enough to "give Glen his freedom" (he would escape into another room, then I could turn the TV back on). Seriously. The magnetic quality of the TV to Glen is something of a joke between us.
There have never been more than maybe 3-4 shows that we tried to watch in any season. Right now we watch Castle (ABC) and Psych (USA). And with Castle sometimes having inappropriate subject matter (and even Psych, occasionally), I wonder how long I'll tune in.
(and this brings up how sad I think it is when, like on Monday when the journal question for the reading class I was subbing in was "If you could only watch one show on TV, what would it be and why?", these 12 and 13 year old kids' favorite shows are things that, in my opinion obviously, they shouldn't be watching--things that
I don't watch because of content...really several boys' favorite show was "Two and a Half Men" and "Family Guy" and "The Simpsons")
So, instead of TV, I've been doing a lot of reading...which isn't always as good as I can only read (can't get chores done at the same time as I did while I watching TV). In the past month, I have read 8 books (though some have been teen fiction, so aren't as long as some others I have read in the past).
The last 2 books I read, I started while subbing at the Junior High. Funny thing is that both books (
Down the Rabbit Hole and
Zach's Lie) deal with 13 year olds and have some theatre invovled )the first has an adaptation of
Alice in Wonderland and the second is an adaptation of
The Phantom of the Opera). I basically enjoyed them both, but have some reservations about 13 year olds reading them (due to some of the messages that might influence kids into thinking it's OK to have relationships at that age--of course I realize that plenty of 13 year olds do date, but I don't think that should be encouraged). I know I'm
a lot pickier than some and silly things get me riled.
For example, in
Down the Rabbit Hole, the heroine, 13 year old Ingrid, sneaks into a crime scene and takes her cleats out so no one will find out she had been to the murdered lady's house. After her grandfather gets her to essentially commit fraud (though I agree with his intent, if not his method for trying to save his farm land), she takes her grandfather's car out of his garage while he is napping. She drives it, at age 13 with only a few minutes practice driving a tractor, several miles down the country road to see the mother of the dead woman. Then she steals an envelope while there. She cheats on her math homework and then is all mad when the teacher thinks she cheated on her math quiz (even though she didn't cheat on the quiz there's circumstantial evidence to suggest she did). She also kisses a boy, who although the were raised in the same town it seems like she realistically barely knows the boy. Her older brother, a jock, punches her in the eye when he gets mad at her and that never seems to be addressed. She never tells anyone about it and her brother never apologizes or anything. And of course, she's lying left and right while she's trying to solve the murder so the police chief won't suspect her. I know Hannah really loved the book when she read it a year ago, but she says that she remembers almost nothing about it now.
Zach's Lie was a bit frustrating for me, but not in the same manner, although at 13 he does wind up with a girlfriend of sorts, though they never kiss. What drove me a little crazy here was the fact that I want my fiction to be real. This is really silly, I know, but on his first day in school in Elko he goes to PE. From PE he goes to homeroom. After homeroom it's lunchtime, for crying out loud. Even if he was on a block schedule it wouldn't work. Doesn't anyone read for logical flow of events???
One of my pet peeves in fiction (and I think Diane Mott Davidson has been guilty of this several times) is when they put on a pot of water to boil and -no kidding (like who would kid about such a ridiculous subject)--within one to two paragraphs of dialog not only has the water boiled, but they are drinking the tea already. Reality. I want reality. You are all thinking I need to get a life, I'm sure.
So, been reading a lot. It really is amazing how much time I seem to have now that I don't have to check with the TV all the time to make sure I'm not missing anything fascinating. (which reminds me, I need to look up NOVA so I can watch it online...)